This article explores the significance of cross-examination in legal proceedings, focusing on its role in common law versus civil law jurisdictions, particularly in Asian countries. It addresses cultural perceptions, historical influences, and critiques of cross-examination, while proposing pathways for reform and integration in civil law systems. By understanding the dynamics of cross-examination, legal practitioners can enhance procedural justice and the reliability of witness testimony, promoting fairness in trials. Join us in examining how cross-examination can evolve within the context of diverse legal frameworks.