/ˈriːzənəbl daʊt ˈstændərd/ – Phrase
Definition: tiêu chí về tính được chứng minh khi không có sự nghi ngờ có căn cứ (trong vụ kiện hình sự).
A more thorough explanation: The “reasonable doubt standard” is a legal concept used in criminal trials to determine the level of certainty that the prosecution must prove in order to secure a conviction. It refers to the requirement that the jury must have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt in order to acquit them. In other words, if the jury has any reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt, they must find the defendant not guilty. This standard is intended to protect the rights of the accused and ensure that they are not wrongfully convicted.
Example: In a criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt standard in order to secure a conviction.
Related words:
- standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt
- (to) prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt
- (to) prove guilt beyond all reasonable doubt
- (to) prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt
- proof beyond all reasonable doubt
- proof beyond any reasonable doubt
- DOUBT
- proof beyond reasonable doubt
- evidential (evidentiary) standard
- rule of doubt