/dʒuːˈdɪʃəl sɛlf rɪˈstreɪnt/ – Phrase
Definition: việc tự giới hạn quyền tư pháp ở những vụ án thuộc thẩm quyền xét xử của nó.
A more thorough explanation: Judicial self-restraint refers to the principle that judges should exercise caution and limit the extent of their own power when interpreting laws or making decisions, in order to respect the roles of other branches of government and uphold the separation of powers. This concept emphasizes that judges should avoid overstepping their authority and should defer to the legislative and executive branches whenever possible.
Example: In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court demonstrated judicial self-restraint by refusing to issue a writ of mandamus against the executive branch, thereby avoiding a direct confrontation between the branches of government.