/kənˈflɪktɪŋ prɪˈzʌmpʃənz/ – Phrase
Definition: những suy đoán mâu thuẫn với nhau.
A more thorough explanation: Conflicting presumptions refer to situations in legal proceedings where there are two or more presumptions that are inconsistent or contradictory with each other. These conflicting presumptions may arise when there are competing interpretations or inferences that can be drawn from the same set of facts or evidence, leading to uncertainty or ambiguity in determining the truth or validity of a claim or argument. Resolving conflicting presumptions often requires careful analysis and consideration of the relevant legal principles and evidence to determine which presumption should prevail in a particular case.
Example: In the case of Smith v. Jones, the court had to resolve the conflicting presumptions regarding the ownership of the property in question.